<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cullinan Diamond</title>
	<link>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/</link>
	<description>Best rated diamonds of the world!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Cullinan Diamond by: franky</title>
		<link>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2223</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2223</guid>
					<description>I want to have the photo of &quot;The Cullinan Diamond&quot; , &quot;Cullinan 1&quot; (Sceptre) , &quot;Cullinan2&quot; (The imperial state crown). But need to high resolution , because I want to print it. May i have the softcopy of it?And How much can I have it?Please send me a email at : franky@apaxgroup.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.diamondiva.com/comment/103/2223" class="cl_comment_link"><span class="cl_comment_excerpt">I want to have the photo of &#8220;The Cullinan Diamond&#8221; , &#8220;Cullinan 1&#8243; (Sceptre) , &#8220;Cullinan2&#8243; (The imperial state crown). But need to high resolution , because I want to print it. May i have the softcopy of it?And How much can I have it?Please send me a email at : franky@apaxgroup.com</span></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Cullinan Diamond by: Pabs</title>
		<link>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2216</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2216</guid>
					<description>I think the writing may be done by someone who does not speak Enlish as their first language, so perhaps you could ask him what his first language is and try to write in that as well as he writes in English.
Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.diamondiva.com/comment/103/2216" class="cl_comment_link"><span class="cl_comment_excerpt">I think the writing may be done by someone who does not speak Enlish as their first language, so perhaps you could ask him what his first language is and try to write in that as well as he writes in English.  Just a thought.</span></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Cullinan Diamond by: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2206</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2206</guid>
					<description>Nathon, I am actually concerned you are brain dead! 

I am pretty sure he incorrectly arranged his words, stating 'biggest ever found diamond' rather than 'biggest diamond ever found' as opposed to wanting to appear clever.  

The 2nd point you have completely misred, being not that the cullinan 1 was originally part of a 3k+ carat unpolished stone (quite obvious), but that the 3k+ carat stone might have originally been part of a 5k+ carat unpolished stone, but that only the 3k+ stone was published as having being found.  

I hope my punctuation or message does not get critisised by another cretin who can't read or make a reasonable point.  And just in case you think I am trying to say i am 'sure pretty' make sure you re-read the 2nd paragraph again, numpty!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.diamondiva.com/comment/103/2206" class="cl_comment_link"><span class="cl_comment_excerpt">Nathon, I am actually concerned you are brain dead!     I am pretty sure he incorrectly arranged his words, stating &#8216;biggest ever found diamond&#8217; rather than &#8216;biggest diamond ever found&#8217; as opposed to wanting to appear clever.      The 2nd point you have completely misred, being not that the cullinan 1 was originally part of a 3k+ carat unpolished stone (quite obvious), but that the 3k+ carat stone might have originally been part of a 5k+ carat unpolished stone, but that only the 3k+ stone was published as having being found.      I hope my punctuation or message does not get critisised by another cretin who can&#8217;t read or make a reasonable point.  And just in case you think I am trying to say i am &#8217;sure pretty&#8217; make sure you re-read the 2nd paragraph again, numpty!!!</span></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on The Cullinan Diamond by: Nathon</title>
		<link>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2183</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 09:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.diamondiva.com/103/the-cullinan/#comment-2183</guid>
					<description>&quot;The Cullinan diamond is the biggest ever found diamond. The Cullinan weighed 3,106 carats and was found in South Africa. There are rumors that the original diamond was even bigger!&quot;

Well, yes.  It was found.  The ones that haven't been found are the biggest ever diamonds that we haven't found.  What you could have said was the ordinary, perfectly cogent 'biggest diamond ever found' instead of trying to be all technical, and sound clever.  And, as for the rumours, they are not rumours but sheer inescapable reason; of course the stone from which those pictured were cut - was bigger.  

For God's sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.diamondiva.com/comment/103/2183" class="cl_comment_link"><span class="cl_comment_excerpt">&#8220;The Cullinan diamond is the biggest ever found diamond. The Cullinan weighed 3,106 carats and was found in South Africa. There are rumors that the original diamond was even bigger!&#8221;    Well, yes.  It was found.  The ones that haven&#8217;t been found are the biggest ever diamonds that we haven&#8217;t found.  What you could have said was the ordinary, perfectly cogent &#8216;biggest diamond ever found&#8217; instead of trying to be all technical, and sound clever.  And, as for the rumours, they are not rumours but sheer inescapable reason; of course the stone from which those pictured were cut - was bigger.      For God&#8217;s sake.</span></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
