Nathon, I am actually concerned you are brain dead! I am pretty sure he incorrectly arranged his words, stating 'biggest ever found diamond' rather than 'biggest diamond ever found' as opposed to wanting to appear clever. The 2nd point you have completely misred, being not that the cullinan 1 was originally part of a 3k+ carat unpolished stone (quite obvious), but that the 3k+ carat stone might have originally been part of a 5k+ carat unpolished stone, but that only the 3k+ stone was published as having being found. I hope my punctuation or message does not get critisised by another cretin who can't read or make a reasonable point. And just in case you think I am trying to say i am 'sure pretty' make sure you re-read the 2nd paragraph again, numpty!!!...
Nathon, I am actually concerned you are brain dead!
I am pretty sure he incorrectly arranged his words, stating ‘biggest ever found diamond’ rather than ‘biggest diamond ever found’ as opposed to wanting to appear clever.
The 2nd point you have completely misred, being not that the cullinan 1 was originally part of a 3k+ carat unpolished stone (quite obvious), but that the 3k+ carat stone might have originally been part of a 5k+ carat unpolished stone, but that only the 3k+ stone was published as having being found.
I hope my punctuation or message does not get critisised by another cretin who can’t read or make a reasonable point. And just in case you think I am trying to say i am ’sure pretty’ make sure you re-read the 2nd paragraph again, numpty!!!
Next comment: "I think the writing may be done by someo [...]"
Previous comment: ""The Cullinan diamond is the biggest eve [...]"
Comment to: The Cullinan Diamond